How to Write the Dissertation Discussion Chapter.
The scientific format may seem confusing for the beginning science writer due to its rigid structure which is so different from writing in the humanities. One reason for using this format is that it is a means of efficiently communicating scientific findings to the broad community of scientists in a uniform manner.
A scientific report moves from general to particular to general. It begins in the Introduction with the theory related to the experiment, moves on to the work carried out in the Methods and Results sections and returns to general ideas in the Discussion by discussing whether the results obtained are, or are not, consistent with the theory.
On these pages, you'll find answers to some of the questions you may have been asking yourself (or your friends, or your supervisor), as well as some examples of Discussion sections from past theses. We've also included some suggestions from the experts about how to start writing your discussion.
Your Discussion and Conclusions sections should answer the question: What do your results mean? In other words, the majority of the Discussion and Conclusions sections should be an interpretation of your results. You should: Discuss your conclusions in order of most to least important.
In our latest blog, we provide guidance on how to address the challenge of crafting a suitable Discussion section in scientific writing. Researchers often say that constructing the Discussion section is the hardest part of the paper-writing process.
Characteristics of good scientific writing. Good scientific writing is: clear - it avoids unnecessary detail; simple - it uses direct language, avoiding vague or complicated sentences. Technical terms and jargon are used only when they are necessary for accuracy.
Scientific research reports are an important part of finishing up science projects and sharing your results. The standard format for these types of reports includes an abstract, introduction.